Hi everyone this week was amusing, we learn new things from the teams and this week was the time for Daniel, Xenia, and Astrid team, they were teaching Grammar and the topic was Food despite there were not too many children the class was given as usual.
What I like from the class: First, Daniel´s performance he was confident, he did not have problems to start the class, he had a well control of the time, gave clear instructions. In spite that the presentation was pretty difficult for children and something striking was that I thought It had not been so clear but there was no problem in the other stages so it means children understood the explanation and the uses of is it and are
they. The other thing was the time to copy; he gave them time to take some notes about the grammar class. The second person to give the following stages was Xenia, something I want to highly is the attitude of her, she had the smile that make students feel comfortable, she looked excited giving the class and doing all the activities. I think that the activities were appealing for students, they were in movement and that is vital when teaching children, they need to be active, the materials they used were interesting, and they decorated the classroom according to the topic they finished the class on time, there were no delaying. The last person to pass was Astrid, she gave the production if I am not bad. She had a good attitude and develop each stage quite good, she looked enough confident and had a good control of the class.
What I did not like: well there were certain things which I noted when the group developed the grammar class first the problem with the tape, Astrid was looking at the teacher quite a few time when she was giving her part. She seemed as if she was expecting the approval of the teacher with her eyes or maybe with gestures, she seemed at first like a little anxious or concerned about something, she had one of the hardest part and I am not talking about teaching a tough topic but facing an unwilling kid to pass in front to do the activity, at the end she took the decision of replacing the kid and did it by herself with the other girl. This is the first time I saw this awkward situation, but I think she handled it well.
Things to improve: in this section, I would say that there a few things which they have to improve. They are not the big deal but I know they will improve them. First the explanation of grammar was little confusing, it could have been done more simple, the other thing is related to grammar using the question ( is it) Astrid ask in her part of the class this little mistake she said to the children (it is cheese )
in form of question and the correct had to be (Is it chees?) furthermore, she had problems with the masking tape, I think that we can use other type of tape, one more resistant to avoid this kind of inconvenience.
In conclusion: the group was good at giving the grammar class, I consider they showed us a well way to teach this skill, in my opinion I think that this skill is the toughest to teach but they did it well of course we have to learn from this class and the team have to keep on working and trying to get a better level than today, up to now I believe that we all in the class have learned from each other and that is completely magnificent this is the purpose of the class and it is being attained.



















